2016 Report details for project: Shared Services Implementation Programme

Project name: Shared Services Implementation Programme - there are 4 reports for this project: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
Google search: Google search on project name (opens in new window) opens in new window
Organisation: DFT (D9) - see all reports for this organisation
Report year: 2016 (data is from Sept 2015)
Category: ICT - see all reports for this category
Description: To centralise transactional functions for Finance, Human Resources, Payroll and Procurement into two Independent Shared Service Centres.
DCA (RAG): Red
DCA text: The DfT Shared Services Implementation Programme comprises a series of planned (tranche) migrations to the new ISSC-1 service provision. Originally scheduled to complete by the end of the 2014 calendar year, delays to the tranche-2 & 3 migration, mean a rightward shift of later planned deliveries. Consequently it is currently anticipated that the programme will not be finalised until end 2017 as on-going delivery issues have recently resulted in a further slippage. Close interaction between the supplier (arvato) and the DfT is on-going to monitor and correct variance from delivery plans.
Start date: 2010-12-10
End date: 2015-06-01
Schedule text: Re-planning is underway regarding the broader migration schedule for the DfT Business units left to move across to the Agresso system. The Department is aiming at agreeing a robust schedule of migrations underpinned by evidence of delivery.
Baseline: £20.20m
Forecast: £11.17m
Variance: -0.45%
Variance text: The changes in the migration dates have meant that the Programme team has needed to stay in place for longer than originally planned to see through the re-planning and subsequent migrations of the DfT family of business units.
Whole Life Cost: £222.30m
WLCost text: Measurable monetarised benefits will result following the successful migration of the DfT family of business units, now scheduled for end-2017. The financial benefits have been calculated by taking the costs of services if the Shared Services Centre remained in DfT ownership and cost of core service under the divestment case (F/C) and comparing the difference. Framework Authority commercial discussion may impact overall benefits, but the detail remains sketchy at this time. Consequently, the profile of benefits is subject to change.
Notes1:
Notes2:
Sourcefile: IPA_2016.csv

Home Selection Search All Reports All Projects (+dates) All Projects (+costs) All Organisations All Years All Categories


Acknowledgement: GMPP data has been re-used under the Open Government Licence.